Resistance to Rome 3

Ian, Jerome and Sarah (a Jew, a Catholic and a Protestant), the three attorneys who love to show up early to work to argue, find themselves arguing Israel's legal right to the Land of Israel this time around. Sarah poses a question that could devastate Israel's enemies. Is it legal for a Jew to accept a written declaration from the non-Jewish government who is in legal control of the Land of Israel at the time, granting a Jew a right to set up a Jewish government in the Land of Israel? If Pilate's Declaration was legal (that Jesus was the king of the Jews), was not Balfour's Declaration legal (granting Jews a legal right to establish a homeland in Israel)? After all, it is claimed by Rome to this day that Pilate's Declaration was issued by the Roman government, in a court of law, to a Jew (whom the apostles claimed in writing was the biological son of King David through King Solomon on Jesus' biological father -Joseph's- side), and therefore why Jesus was willing to pay Rome's legal price to receive the title "king" in a Roman court of law?